9. CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS:

[Handwritten response, underlined:] States none

10. INTERVIEWING OFFICER'S COMMENTS:

[Handwritten response, underlined:] Photo of p/appl. [primary applicant] is very good likeness. He is Fully European. Wife however, is much darker than photo, and is [the words ‘in face’ are crossed out] Fully N/E (Indian). A very well presented, pleasant, intelligent couple who have Fluent English.

Have regular contact with P/Appl's [primary applicant’s] relatives (aunt & cousin) in Australia and have quite a good idea of what to expect.

In my opinion they would represent a good migration gain.

11. ASSESSMENT OF FAMILY: Group [Handwritten] 2.

[Five typed grades: 'Fails to meet standards', 'Barely meets standards but acceptable', 'Meets standards’, '(Above standards)', 'Well above standards'. 'Above standards' has been circled.]

12. RECOMMENDATION:

Acceptance recommended / not recommended. [Not recommended has been crossed out.]

[Illegible handwritten signature] Interviewing Officer

[Handwritten date:] 1/10/1968

13.  APPROVED / NOT APPROVED  [Blank space for signature; blank space for date.]