


Transcript
[Small bold header:] [3403]
[Image of the coat of arms of the Commonwealth of Australia.]
[Main heading in large gothic font:] Commonwealth of Australia Gazette
[Subheading:] PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 55 CANBERRA, MONDAY, 26 JUNE 1967[.]
[Dividing line.]
[The page is divided into two columns. Left column.]
[Bold text:] Commonwealth of Australia
[Heading:] STATEMENT SHOWING RESULT OF REFERENDUM UPON PROPOSED LAW TO ALTER THE CONSTITUTION WITH RESPECT TO PARLIAMENT[.]
WHEREAS in pursuance of the Writ issued by the Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia on the twenty-eighth day of April, 1967 to me, a proposed law to alter the Constitution entitled "Constitution Alteration (Parliament) 1967" was, on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1967, submitted according to law in each State to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives: And whereas in pursuance of the Referendum (Constitution Alteration) Act 1906-1966 a statement of the voting on the submission (in the said Act referred to as the Referendum) has been indorsed on the said Writ: And whereas by the said Act it is enacted that the Chief Electoral Officer shall publish a copy of the said statement in the Gazette, and that the statement so published shall, subject to the said Act, be conclusive evidence of the result of the Referendum: Now therefore I do hereby certify that the statement hereunder set out is a true copy of the statement indorsed on the said Writ, and do publish the statement in the Gazette in pursuance of the said Act.
F. L. LEY
Chief Electoral Officer for the Commonwealth
[Dividing line.]
[Subheading:] STATEMENT INDORSED ON THE WRIT ABOVE REFERRED TO
I certify that in pursuance of the within Writ a proposed law to alter the provisions of the Constitution entitled "Constitution Alteration (Parliament) 1967", was submitted to the electors in each State of the Commonwealth on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1967, and that the result of the voting as regards each State and as regards the Commonwealth was as follows:
[The following information is presented in table format at the base of the left column. The table has 4 columns and 8 rows. The headings of the 4 columns are, respectively: '1. State. 2. Number of Votes give IN FAVOUR of the Proposed Law. 3. Number of Votes given NOT IN FAVOUR of the Proposed Law. And 4. Number of Ballot-papers rejected as INFORMAL.'. The data presented in the rows is shown below, with a full stop between the information of each column.]
New South Wales[. Votes in favour:] 1,087,694[.] [Not in favour:] 1,044,458[.] [Informal:] 34,355[.]
Victoria[. Votes in favour:] 496,826[. Not in favour:] 1,112,506[. Informal:] 21,262[.]
Queensland[. Votes in favour:] 370,200[. Not in favour:] 468,673[. Informal:] 9,855[.]
South Australia[. Votes in favour:] 186,344[. Not in favour:] 363,120[. Informal:] 11,380[.]
Western Australia[. Votes in favour:] 114,841[. Not in favour:] 280,523[. Informal:] 10,302[.]
Tasmania[. Votes in favour:] 42,764[. Not in favour:] 142,660[. Informal:] 3,821[.]
Totals for the Commonwealth[. Votes in favour:] 2,298,669[. Not in favour:] 3,411,940[. Informal:] 90,975[.]
[End of table.]
Dated this twenty-second day of June, 1967.
F. L. LEY
Chief Electoral Officer for the Commonwealth[.]
[Right column.]
[Bold text:] Commonwealth of Australia[.]
[Heading:] STATEMENT SHOWING RESULT OF REFERENDUM UPON PROPOSED LAW TO ALTER THE CONSTITUTION WITH RESPECT TO ABORIGINALS[.]
WHEREAS in pursuance of the Writ issued by the Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia on the twenty-eighth day of April, 1967 to me, a proposed law to alter the Constitution entitled "Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967" was, on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1967, submitted according to law in each State to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives: And whereas in pursuance of the Referendum (Constitution Alteration) Act 1906-1966 a statement of the voting on the submission (in the said Act referred to as the Referendum) has been indorsed on the said Writ: And whereas by the said Act it is enacted that the Chief Electoral Officer shall publish a copy of the said statement in the Gazette, and that the statement so published shall, subject to the said Act, be conclusive evidence of the result of the Referendum: Now therefore I do hereby certify that the statement hereunder set out is a true copy of the statement indorsed on the said Writ, and do publish the statement in the Gazette in pursuance of the said Act.
F. L. LEY
Chief Electoral Officer for the Commonwealth
[Dividing line.]
[Subheading:] STATEMENT INDORSED ON THE WRIT ABOVE REFERRED TO
I certify that in pursuance of the within Writ a proposed law to alter the provisions of the Constitution entitled "Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967", was submitted to the electors in each State of the Commonwealth on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1967, and that the result of the voting as regards each State and as regards the Commonwealth was as follows:
[The following information is presented in table format at the base of the right column. The table has 4 columns and 8 rows. The headings of the 4 columns are, respectively: '1. State. 2. Number of Votes give IN FAVOUR of the Proposed Law. 3. Number of Votes given NOT IN FAVOUR of the Proposed Law. And 4. Number of Ballot-papers rejected as INFORMAL.''. The data presented in the rows is shown below, with a full stop between the information of each column.]
New South Wales[. Votes in favour:] 1,949,036[. Not in favour:] 182,010[. Informal:] 35,461[.]
Victoria[. Votes in favour:] 1,525,026[. Not in favour:] 85,611[. Informal:] 19,957[.]
Queensland[. Votes in favour:] 748,612[. Not in favour:] 90,587[. Informal:] 9,529[.]
South Australia[. Votes in favour:] 473,440[. Not in favour:] 75,383[. Informal:] 12,021[.]
Western Australia[. Votes in favour:] 319,823[. Not in favour:] 75,282[. Informal:] 10,561[.]
Tasmania[. Votes in favour:] 167,176[. Not in favour:] 18,134[. Informal:] 3,935[.]
Totals for the Commonwealth[. Votes in favour:] 5,183,113[. Not in favour:] 527,007[. Informal:] 91,464[.]
[End of table.]
Dated this twenty-second day of June, 1967.
F. L. LEY
Chief Electoral Officer for the Commonwealth[.]
[dividing line.]
[Footer:]
[In italics:] Registered at the General Post Office, Melbourne, for transmission by post as a
By Authority: A. J. ARTHUR, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra
8719/67—PRICE 5c (plus postage)
About this record
The Commonwealth of Australia Gazette provides information about what is happening in the Australian Government including publishing the results of Federal elections and referenda. This document is the announcement of the results of the two questions put to Australian voters in the 1967 referendum.
1967 referendum: two questions and two results
On 27 May 1967, two questions were put to voters. The first question about the ‘Constitution Alteration (Parliament) 1967’, known as the ‘nexus question’, related to Section 24 of the Australian Constitution. The referendum proposed that the Australian Constitution be altered “to increase the number of members of the House of Representatives without necessarily increasing the number of Senators”.
The results of the nexus question, which can be seen in the left-hand column of the document, show that the alteration did not pass. This question received a vote of only 40.25% nationally with only one state, New South Wales, voting in favour of the proposed changes.
The results of the second question about the ‘Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967’ can be seen in the right-hand column. This question proposed alterations to sections 51 (xxvi) and 127 of the Australian Constitution. These alterations would remove references in the Australian Constitution discriminating against First Australians, allowing Australian Parliament to make laws in relation to First Australians and include First Australians in the national census.
90.77% of voters voted in favour of the ‘Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967’, which was the highest ‘yes’ vote ever recorded in a federal referendum.
Related themes
Need help with your research?
Learn how to interpret primary sources, use our collection and more.