The Dreadnought Scheme

In 1903, the new Commonwealth of Australia agreed to pay £200,000 per year towards the expenses of the Imperial Squadron in the Pacific, but had no special naval vessels of its own. When in 1909 Germany’s aggressive naval building program threatened Britain’s naval supremacy, the Lord Mayor of Sydney, Sir Allen Taylor, convened a meeting in the Sydney Town Hall to establish a fund to purchase a Dreadnought (battleship) for presentation to Great Britain.

The gathering was held in a mood of wild enthusiasm, and after a series of rousing speeches by leading politicians, the following resolutions were ‘carried unanimously’:

  1. That in the opinion of this meeting of citizens glorying in the traditions of the British race, of which they are a part, the time has arrived for the Commonwealth to take an active share in the naval defence of the Empire;
  2. That in view of the expressed determination of Britain’s rivals to challenge her naval supremacy, Australia should present a Dreadnought to the British Navy as an immediate expression of her invincible resolve to stand by the Mother country and take her place in the Empire’s firing line;
  3. … a fund be now opened to be called the Lord Mayor’s Fund to which contributions towards the cost of a Dreadnought can be paid.

Over the ensuing year some £90,000 was subscribed from towns, shires, organisations and individuals throughout New South Wales. Over half the fund was subscribed by five large donors. However, by the middle of the year, the Deakin Government had decided to establish an Australian navy and the proposal to present Britain with a battleship seemed unnecessary. However, imperial enthusiasm remained strong.

The question arose what to do with the subscriptions, and some were returned to identified donors who wished for their money back. Most did not, and the Dreadnought Trust was established to dispose of the remainder, some £80,000. After discussion, it was agreed with widespread public support to donate around half to the Government towards the establishment of a naval college at Jervis Bay to train young Australians for the new navy; and the other half was placed in a fund to bring young men from British cities to be trained as rural workers on New South Wales farms.

A suitable venue for the boys’ training was found near Pitt Town (Windsor) in the Hawkesbury River area, about twenty miles from Sydney, a 2 500 acre farm established by the New South Wales Government in 1893 to train city boys to be useful farmers – not with conspicuous success, since relatively few offered to be trained. The farm was called ‘Scheyville’ after the Director of Labour in NSW, W F Schey.

During the latter months of 1910, the Trustees of the Dreadnought Fund entered into an agreement with the NSW Government to bring out British boys between the ages of 16 and 19 ‘of good character and physique at a rate of about twenty every fortnight and to pay the Government £5 for each of the lads sent to the training farm’. The first ‘Dreadnought boys’ – twelve in number – arrived on 21 April 1911 and were followed by 27 others on 15 June. Overall, by February 1915, 2 557 boys had arrived, and when the last group arrived in September 1939, the total number of Dreadnought boys brought to the state had reached 5 595.

Three years after World War I, the Dreadnought Trust recommenced its activities. Young men were again selected by Commonwealth Immigration officers in London from among those offering, recommended by county colonization societies and unemployment bureaux. Australia also advertised vigorously for young migrants. The young men were granted assisted passages to Australia. On arrival they were to receive a small amount of pocket money – not wages – while they trained, either at Scheyville for two to three months, or, for a select few, a twelve months course at one of the state agricultural colleges. At these, general farming was pursued in addition to some particular branch of agriculture suited to the locality: at Glen Innes in the New England tablelands, pastoral pursuits; at Wollongbar in the Richmond River district, dairy farming; at Grafton near the Clarence River, sub-tropical fruit culture; and at Cowra in the mid-west, sheep breeding and plant cultivation.

At Scheyville the training was severely practical and the regimen sparse. It was intended to approximate the standard of living the young men might expect to enjoy during their first years of employment. On completing the course to the satisfaction of the manager they were drafted to their first job and granted a £2 good conduct bonus. Wages in their first situation were 15/- to £2 per week with board and lodging. Thereafter, their welfare was supervised by the New Settlers League – from 1921 to 1930; and afterwards, by the British Settlers Welfare Committee. The latter body is considered to have been more effective than the former. Each employed travelling welfare officers to visit the boys on the farms and check their progress, treatment, prospects and conduct.

In 1923, the New South Wales Government introduced the Juvenile Migrants Apprenticeship Act for the care and control of juvenile migrants, but its provisions were draconian and it lasted only two years. Neither employers nor the young men were satisfied. Many absconded from their employment. The Act was repealed in 1926 and replaced by another which gave the Minister control of the training and of supervision during employment, but only until the age of eighteen. Employers were expected to notify the department before sacking a young man, and the young men were expected to inform the Minister after they changed their employment.

On paper all these arrangements seemed reasonable and many Dreadnought boys found satisfaction in their new lives, but there were serious problems for the majority. They were city boys being trained as farm labourers, and existing as strangers in a strange land. They were young and immature, scattered over vast distances, exploitable and exploited. They suffered loneliness, homesickness, ‘Pommy bashing’ and culture shock. Many returned – over the years – to Great Britain, especially during the Depression when some faced unemployment without the support networks taken for granted by long-standing residents. There were some widely-publicised suicides among the boys and deaths from illness and accidents. It was a tough apprenticeship.

The training received at Scheyville was basic, conditions were primitive and staff were semi-literate, usually veterans of World War I who could not obtain better positions anywhere else. Over the years – for those Dreadnought boys who stayed – conditions improved and they could profit from the buoyant years of the 1950s and 1960s.

When one considers the numbers of young men who came to Australia under the Dreadnought Scheme – over 5 000 – the number and coverage of the files is limited. However, it is possible to gain a clear understanding of the genesis of the scheme, its implementation and its problems. There are numerous lists, some newspaper cuttings, some photos and overall, material of interest to genealogists in this section.

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, ANNUAL SINGLE NUMBER SERIES, 1904–20A2
Recorded by:1904–11Prime Minister’s Office (CA 588)
Quantity:30.06 metresLocation:

Canberra

‘Dreadnought’, 1909A2, 1914/4051
 
CORRESPONDENCE AND PRINTED MATTER ARRANGED ACCORDING TO SUBJECT (‘SPECIAL PORTFOLIO’), 1888–1936A6661
Recorded by:Governor-General (CA 1)
Quantity:10.26 metresLocation:

Canberra

Naval assistance (Dreadnought battleship). Proposed gift by Australia to the United Kingdom, 1909 [30 pages]
Public meetings in New South Wales and Victoria, orchestrated by the parliamentary opposition, initiated the idea of Australia donating a battleship to the British navy. The main event was a gathering at Sydney Town Hall on 25 April 1909, which was reported in the Sydney Morning Herald three days later and by the Governor of NSW to Lord Crewe, Secretary of State for the Colonies:

meeting largely attended… utmost enthusiasm prevailed… the following resolutions were passed unanimously: That in the opinion of this meeting of citizens glorifying in the traditions of the British Race of which they are a part, the time has arrived for the Commonwealth to take an active share in the Naval Defence of the Empire to show its invincible resolve to stand by the Mother Country and take her place in the Empire’s firing line… a Dreadnought for the Royal Navy.

In the end, the Australian Government led by Alfred Deakin decided the time was appropriate to establish an Australian navy and the proposal lapsed.

A6661, 950
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, CLASS 1 (GENERAL PASSPORTS), 1939–1970A659
Recorded by:1939Department of the Interior [I] (CA 27)
1939–45Department of the Interior [II] (CA 31)
Quantity:101.25 metresLocation:

Canberra

Josephs, M. Dreadnought ex ‘Arama’ 2/39, 1940–42 [30 pages]
This file records the exceptional, but fruitless effort, in the context of wartime conditions, to locate, Montague Josephs, a Dreadnought boy, at the request of his mother who was distressed at not having had correspondence for six months – when the search began. ‘Montagu’, perhaps understandably, had changed his name and was last heard of in the AIF in its Middle East campaign.
A659, 1942/1/3206
Dreadnought Boys, 1929–43 [c.200 pages]
The first item is a memorandum regarding ‘Additional Accommodation for Dreadnought boys at the Grafton Experimental Farm’. Meanwhile, the British Government representative for migration (in Australia), Bankes-Amery writes to the Development and Migration Commission, Melbourne, 23 January 1929:

As you are aware… the Secretary of State has an agreement with the Trustees of the Dreadnought Fund under which we help them in their work by meeting half their expenses.

The agreement was due for renewal. At this time, with depression looming, an extract from the ‘Monthly Report of the Migration and Settlement Office’, London, January 1929, is pessimistic:

The recruiting of boys will become increasingly difficult during the next year or two… Canada is now very actively seeking boys and is able to offer a good deal more than we are at the moment. Free passages and certain special facilities for lending capital are the main factors… the rural basic wage in NSW has ensured the dismissal of many of these lads on attaining 21 years… letter-writing… adverse publicity [in Britain] which, if continued, will practically kill the Dreadnought movement.

Meanwhile, despite its endowment the Dreadnought Trustees were always hampered by lack of ready cash. This is plain in a departmental memo concerning the Trust, dated 1 February 1929. There is a major outline, dated 6 March ‘Extracts from Reports on Dreadnought Lads showing their progress’. What follows are 81 ‘thumbnail sketches’ of the boys’ success. The statement was sent to the Under-Secretary, Development and Migration Commission, Melbourne. There is a copy of the Dreadnought Trust agreement with the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs under the ESA, and the report of a visit to the Scheyville Training farm by British representative, E G Crutchley, dated 3 April 1929. With the drift towards depression, the correspondence stresses the problems associated with the scheme: the competition with Canada for the best young men; the bad publicity in Britain ‘of strikes, labour troubles, unemployment, droughts, injuries, occasional suicides and rural wages awards’ in Australia. On 29 August, the Secretary of the Development Commission wrote to his counterpart at the Australian Women’s National League a detailed account of the Trust’s achievements to date which makes this a useful summary for the researcher. Fewer young men were arriving from Britain; but the winding-up of the New Settlers League in 1930 created a crisis over after-care just when it was most required. The Trust took over this work directly with support from the British Government under the ESA. Important correspondence on this development. However, there are no entries for the years 1932–1937 inclusive, and the first item after the hiatus is dated 17 June 1938, a report of a meeting of the British Settlers Welfare Committee and the Dreadnought Trust, which with Government prodding is planning to recommence its migration activities. However the first boys arrived only in March 1939 and only 76 arrived before the outbreak of war. Sydney Morning Herald, 10 September 1939, ‘Farm Migrants Arrive’. Lists of boys arriving are in the file. Already it was clear that it was going to be harder to obtain suitable young men for the scheme, and the problems were summarised by R H Wheeler at the Immigration Department, 27 February 1939, as a declining birth rate in Britain; better employment opportunities for the boys in the UK; the extension of social services whereby youths receive unemployment benefit at an earlier age; the grave international situation; and the disinclination of parents to grant permission to their sons to emigrate. The armed services were attracting suitable young men. The Trust maintained its after-care activities during the early war years, but did not recommence its activities after the war.

A659, 1943/1/1892
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration encouragement, New South Wales. Dreadnought Boys, 1921–45 [c.250 pages]
This commences with renewal of assisted immigration after the Great War and the commencement of British Government financial support for migration. Prime Minister’s Department advises the High Commission, London that the Dreadnought Trust is to resume its migration work, 7 September 1921:

NSW is prepared to accept lads between 15 and 19 years of age for free farm training and maintenance at either Scheyville or one of the apprentice farm schools under the Agricultural Department. Boys for the apprentice farms should be superior class and receive up to twelve months subject to good behaviour and at the option of the boy.

Copy of pamphlet ‘Australia’s Offer to the British Boy’. As the first postwar boys arrived there were teething problems. Age (Melbourne) article, 14 February 1922 ‘Deluded Immigrants’ caused a stir; conditions at Scheyville were spartan; staff were rough-and-ready and often under-qualified. There are echoes of the controversy ignited by the Age and a British investigator at Scheyville was told in no uncertain terms that the boys felt they had been misled in the UK about conditions in Australia. See: Sun (Melbourne), 10 May 1922. The bad publicity hampered recruiting for the scheme. High Commission cable to Prime Minister’s Office, 22 May 1923:

Recent adverse statements press and parliament relative treatment of the lads is making recruitment very difficult… will not obtain full quota of Dreadnoughts.

There is a report on ‘Boy Migration’ from the Premiers Conference, May–June 1923. It stresses the poverty of most of the boys applying for the scheme. Copy of ‘The Boy Settler’, 22 November 1925; its editor was Dr Mary Booth (Empire Service Club), who explained its role to Prime Minister Stanley Bruce, 12 December 1925:

The Boy Settler is devoted to the interests of Dreadnoughts… the Empire Service Club is an activity of the Anzac Fellowship of Women… it had been at work for five years for these boys.

When the Big Brother Movement commenced there was confusion between this and the older Dreadnought Trust. In an interesting development, the Prime Minister’s Department suggested that ‘all future Dreadnought boys may be enrolled as ‘Little Brothers’, (15 December 1925). Copy of Agreement between the British Government and the Dreadnought Trust for the former to provide funds for after-care cost under the ESA. An uneasy relationship between the ANZAC Fellowship of Women, Sydney and the New Settlers League, both of which concerned themselves with the reception and welfare of Dreadnought boys, is revealed in a 1928 letter from Mary Booth.

A461, G349/1/7
British Settlers Welfare Committee – NSW, 1921–36A461, D349/1/11
 
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE, 1926–30CP211/2
Recorded by:1926–30Development and Migration Commission (CA 243)
Quantity:23.94 metresLocation:

Canberra

Migration – State requisitions – NSW – Dreadnought Boys, 1927 [6 pages]
The first item, undated, gives (another) ‘Summary of the Dreadnought Scheme, NSW’ but from a different perspective. It has

assisted to migrate… boys… by assistance towards their passage money and training costs. The Government Training Farm, Scheyville, was established in 1911 when the first group of lads arrived. The farm is situated 37 miles from Sydney in undulating country near the Hawkesbury valley (Windsor). Its area is 2700 acres, 500 cultivated; 40 acres of orchard… Three months training is normal. The lads are accommodated in large dormitories in charge of a specially-selected steward (ex-AIF sergeants). The domestic arrangements are maintained to conform with those the lads will experience subsequently in employment.

There were 80 lads in training at any one time. Since 1911 when twelve boys arrived, the numbers were 1912, 300 boys; 1913, 216; 1914, 712; 1915, 463; 1916, 30; 1917, 17; 1918, one; and 1919–1921, none arrived. During the 1920s, 338 arrived in 1922; 607 in 1923; 422 in 1924; 753 in 1925; 684 in 1926 and 985 in 1927 after which numbers fell off. Apart from the ‘Summary’, the other correspondence stresses seeking younger rather than older boys for the scheme and the accommodation difficulties at Scheyville.

CP211/2, 54/1
Settlement – Land – Dreadnought boys, 1927 [3 pages]
The concern here is the possibility of Dreadnought boys taking up land on their own account. The New Settlers League had asked the Land Settlement Committee, NSW to investigate the matter since under the 1923 agreement certain ‘Dreadnoughts’ were eligible for grants. The reply states the difficulties plainly: ‘the boys’ lack of capital is the critical issue. There are, indeed, twenty blocks in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area soon to be available and four Dreadnought lads have applied, but only one possesses the £300 capital qualification, even before character references are considered’. The reply of the Secretary, New Settlers Committee, to this observation, 12 August 1927, is tart: ‘The £300 minimum capital is too low; the settler must have something to live on while trees grow and crops mature – and to make improvements. The boys cannot make a success on the capital stated. In view of these statements and the great uncertainty of the boy being successful, my executive has decided that it is inadvisable to encourage the boys to take up blocks upon the conditions offered… share-farming opportunities are best’.
CP211/2, 73/3

YMCA youth migration

The YMCA is a non-sectarian, non-political Christian lay movement whose object is to develop high standards of Christian character through group activities and citizenship training. It was founded in 1844 in London when twelve young men led by George Williams, a drapery store employee, established a club for ‘the improvement of the spiritual condition of young men in the drapery and other trades’. The association grew rapidly especially in the United States and it is now a massive worldwide movement with a presence in most countries. Its headquarters is in Geneva, Switzerland.

Gold-rush immigrants brought the YMCA to Australia during the 1850s. The YMCA’s programs include sports and physical training, formal and informal education, camping and citizenship activities. Its branches maintain an international range of youth hostels.

YMCA involvement in youth migration to Australia was peripheral to its many other activities. However, some young people came to Australia under its auspices both during the 1920s and after World War II.

The records held by the National Archives cover reasonably fully the YMCA’s part in bringing some young people to Australia, principally during the 1920s. The material concerns policy in the main and is of little interest to genealogists.

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, MULTIPLE NUMBER SERIES, 1923–34A458
Recorded by:1923–34Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:49.77 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration Encouragement. Oversea Settlement Scheme Agreement between British Government and YMCA, 1923–24 [13 pages]
This contains an eight-page outline of the YMCA Scheme for Youth Migration to Australia, dated 15 June 1923 and signed by Cyril Bavin, General Secretary, Migration Department of the English National Council of YMCAs. This advocated the broadening of the basis of individual nomination of a prospective migrant to its extension from individuals to Church congregations, service clubs, friendly societies and lodges. Bavin stressed that the Migration Department of the English YMCA worked ‘in closest co-operation’ with the Oversea Settlement Committee of the Imperial government and with the London Agents-General of the dominion governments. There is a copy of an agreement conveyed by the Secretary of State at the Dominions Office, the Duke of Devonshire to the Governor-General of Australia, Lord Forster, between the YMCA and HMG:

… providing for the payment for a period of one year of the expenses of two representatives of the Association to enable them to organise and develop the “Collective Nomination Scheme”… which will contribute towards solving the difficult problem of assimilating settlers into the life of a new country.

In fact, three representatives were placed by the YMCA, one each in Victoria, NSW and South Australia.

A458, E154/12
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, ANNUAL SINGLE NUMBER SERIES, 1948–65D400
Recorded by:1948–66Department of Immigration, SA Branch (CA 959)
Quantity:435 metresLocation:

Adelaide

Young Men’s Christian Association – Youth Migration, 1947–61 [9 pages]
The YMCA had proposed on 24 April 1947 to arrange for 100 teenagers to come from the UK to Australia. Arthur Calwell encouraged the idea but stressed that the normal procedures had to be followed. The young men were brought to South Australia and the Immigration Minister extended certain privileges to both the Young Women’s Christian Association and the YMCA so that they could assist in the reception and placement of the youths. The last exchange is from Mr K J Smith at Australia House to the Department in Canberra and the departmental reply. Smith, the Acting CMO, 11 May 1960 suggests why youth migration under YMCA auspices has remained a small operation:

… apparent lack of cooperation between the organisation in Australia and the UK.

A mere 50 boys had come during the preceding decade. The Immigration Department was unconcerned, replying that youth migration had been ‘particularly successful’ overall, and unlike the migration of children, there had been few recruitment difficulties.

D400, SA1960/8091
SG149 YMCA SA126 YMCA Child Migration, 1957–60D400, SA1960/1936
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, SINGLE NUMBER SERIES WITH 'N' (NEW SOUTH WALES) PREFIX, 1952–77C3939
Recorded by:1952–74Department of Immigration, NSW Branch (CA 957)
Quantity:38.7 metresLocation:

Sydney

Immigration – Youth Migration by YMCA, 1960C 3939, N1960/75101
 
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE RECORDS, 1926–50PP6/1
Recorded by:1945–50Department of Immigration, WA Branch (CA 962)
Quantity:20 metresLocation:

Perth

Youth Migration, 1947 [6 pages]
This concerns the YMCA initiative to explore the possibilities for youth migration to Australia as Australia’s postwar immigration policy was commencing. YMCA National Secretary, Mr J T Massey wrote to Arthur Calwell, 24 April 1947 saying that his ‘Migration Committee’ wished to bring 100 boys, 14 to 18 years old, from the UK, in two batches of 50. He hoped to work in association with the YMCA Community Services in London, and requested advice. Calwell’s reply stresses that responsibility for reception and after-care of migrants was a state responsibility and the YMCA should liaise with State Government departments. Shipping is mentioned as a problem. The organisation was advised to see whether it possessed the accommodation facilities and financial resources to assist in youth migration. It is not clear whether the YMCA took its plans any further than this initial approach.
PP6/1, 47/H/1318
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, CLASS 5 (BRITISH MIGRANTS), 1945–50A436
Recorded by:1945Department of the Interior (II) (CA 31)
Quantity:5.04 metresLocation:

Canberra

Major C Bavin – YMCA Migration Representative, 1937–38 [28 pages]
The first item is a cutting from the Herald (Melbourne), 20 December 1937 mentioning that the YMCA in the UK is planning to resume its migration activities, and Major C Bavin, the YMCA Community Services Officer, is arriving to investigate the possibilities. Bavin is an executive member of many immigration societies, including the Overseas League and is also representing the Church of England Migration Council during his tour. He plans to spend three weeks in New Zealand and two months in Australia. Newspaper cuttings of Bavin’s trip. There are two reports of Bavin’s interviews with Mr H A Garrett of the Immigration Department, the second of which is the more informative. Bavin had found a ready response to his plans only in NSW, where the Scheyville farm would provide appropriate training for the boys. Girls were to be included in the scheme. Bavin planned to use the service of the British Settlers Welfare Committee for after-care. Overall, Bavin impressed departmental officers: Garrett wrote to the Secretary, Department of the Interior, 10 February 1938:

I am impressed with Mr Bavin’s scheme for the co-ordination of the voluntary migration effort in NSW through the British Settlers Welfare Committee, particularly the after-care aspect… the after-care of girls will require special consideration; they present more problems than boys.

Bavin’s 16-page report is in the file, dated 22 June 1938. Bavin concluded an agreement with the Department of Labour and Industry in Sydney concerning the placing of 200 boys for farm work. Its main points were: on arrival they would go to Scheyville, there to be trained and maintained for some eight weeks while they learned basic farm work; after their training they would be placed in employment by the department at wages of around £1 per week, the same as for Australian boys of the same age. After-care was to be as discussed.

A436, 1945/5/395 part 1

Youth migration to South Australia

South Australia was the first state to initiate Government guardianship of juvenile immigrants, the system being inaugurated under the Immigration Acts of 1901 and 1913. This plan was cut short by the outbreak of war but in 1922 the Premier, Sir Henry Barwell, revived the movement. His aim was to bring 6 000 teenagers to South Australia to fill the places of the men who were killed during World War I. The first parties were known as ‘Barwell boys’. In 1923, an Immigration Act dealing with farm and domestic apprentices was passed. Under this Act, the Commissioner of Crown Lands and Immigration was appointed the legal guardian of each boy or girl immigrant who made a written declaration of their wish to come under his control. Young men from fifteen to eighteen and young women from eighteen to twenty-one were eligible; the period of Government control was three years.

As was usual with these pioneer immigration schemes, results were patchy, and controversy forced the abandonment of this phase of immigration to South Australia in 1925. A modified scheme was put into operation in 1927, under an amendment to the 1923 Act. Conditions of apprenticeship were relaxed, a greater portion, approximately one half of the total wages was paid direct to the farm apprentice and the number of boys nominated was reduced while each was allotted to a Big Brother. This system worked satisfactorily. By the end of 1928, 1 557 British youths had entered South Australia under the scheme.

There is less archival material available than the numbers who came under the scheme might suggest there should be. There is some interest for family historians among the documents in the files.

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration encouragement – Government schemes – South Australia – Settlement of 6000 boys, 1922–24 [c.250 pages]
This file contains correspondence between the Prime Minister’s Department, the Commonwealth Immigration Office and the Premier’s Department, South Australia, relating to the scheme to introduce 6 000 British boys for farm work, 2 000 per year for three years, commencing in 1922. Two trial batches of 50 boys were sent a month apart, then monthly quotas as arranged. Boys were to be at least fifteen years of age before acceptance. Press statements, cables and letters reveal some early friction between the Prime Minister W M Hughes and Premier Henry Barwell, in the working out of the details of the scheme. Information is provided on financial arrangements between governments, the terms of agreement, loans and wages for the boys, conditions of their apprenticeship and the monthly requisitions. Although early shipments of boys were well received, there were complaints over the selection process when some proved to be below expectations.
A461, P349/1/5
Immigration encouragement – Correspondence with states – South Australia – Settlement of 6000 boys, 1920–25A461, Q349/1/5
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, MULTIPLE NUMBER SERIES, 1923–34A458
Recorded by:1923–34Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:49.77 metresLocation:

Canberra

Boy Farm Apprenticeship Scheme, SA, 1927–28 [11 pages]
Premier, South Australia to Prime Minister, 9 August 1927:

I desire to inform you, in connection with the migration policy of this Government, it is proposed to reintroduce the Boy Farm Apprenticeship Scheme [for 15–17 year olds].

The Premier requested that the Commonwealth migration authorities in the UK commence recruiting suitable young men, but he stressed that medical inspection must be strict; must exclude boys ‘subject to urinary troubles’. There were many such cases in the past; ‘very great inconvenience’. Boys from certain named institutions in the UK were ‘previously very unsatisfactory’. In addition, the boys should not be led to expect too much in South Australia. The Development and Migration Commission took up matters stressing that the farm apprenticeship would be three years; and while noting that wages had increased it also stressed the need for a strict medical examination of intending youth migrants: ‘the teeth and urinary organs’ were to receive close attention; boys wearing glasses were not acceptable. A further memorandum from South Australia stressed that each successful applicant would be provided with a ‘Big Brother’ on arrival, and insurance (against accidents and sickness) and after-care were to be features of the scheme. This file says much about attitudes in the 1920s to youth migration.

A458, V154/11

Youth migration to Tasmania

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, MULTIPLE NUMBER SERIES, 1921–23A457
Recorded by:1911–71Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:18.27 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration Encouragement. Tasmanian Boys, 1922–23 [13 pages]
This deals with early 1920s youth migration to Tasmania. The key correspondence is a letter from a Burnie farmer, Mr C B Elliott, who is indignant at the youth and inexperience of the boys who are arriving in northern Tasmania:

Many boys are not up to standard; not long out of school; should be at home with their parents; 17–18 year olds are wanted; the first arrivals know nothing of farm life.

As a result of the controversy which Elliott’s letter reflects, the CMO, Hobart wrote to the Prime Minister’s Department, 1 November 1923:

… owing to complaints received from employers of the boys, it was decided to discontinue the shipment of further parties.

A457, N400/10
Immigration Encouragement. Gullet’s visit to Tasmania, 1921A457, H400/9
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration encouragement. Early schemes – Tasmania – Policy, 1921–25A461, X349/1/5
Immigration encouragement. Early schemes – Correspondence with the states – Tasmania, 1920–23A461, Y349/1/5
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, MULTIPLE NUMBER SERIES, 1923–34A458
Recorded by:1923–34Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:49.77 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration. New Settlers League – Tasmania, 1921–26 A458, D154/18
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, ANNUAL SINGLE NUMBER SERIES, 1919–29A2487
Recorded by:1920–29Repatriation Commission (CA 225)
Quantity:500 metresLocation:

Canberra

Enquiry regarding application for Immigration Officer for Tasmania, 1921A2487, 1921/7844

Youth migration to Queensland

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration encouragement – Early schemes, Correspondence with States – Queensland, 1920–22A461, N349/1/5
Immigration – Queensland boys, 1921–31A461, F349/1/7

Youth migration to Western Australia

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration encouragement. Correspondence with the States, Western Australia, 1920–22 [75 pages]
This concerns youth migration only marginally. On 30 October 1920, Prime Minister W M Hughes wrote to the Western Australian Premier requesting:

… particulars and capacity of any training farms, if any, at which youths 16 to 20 years of age may receive tuition before employment.

Western Australia guarded its relative independence in all migration matters. In July 1922 the Premier advised that after-care in Western Australia for assisted migrants was handled by the New Settlers League, which was a branch of the well-established Ugly Men’s Association, a prominent service club in the state, which received a grant to pay the expenses of two organisers. In Western Australia, Fairbridge, Pinjarra was concerned with child migration, and the Young Australia League made a limited foray into youth migration.

A461, T349/1/5

Boy Scout youth migration

In 1927, the Victorian Branch of the Boy Scout Association lodged nominations for assisted passages for selected boy scouts from the United Kingdom aged fifteen to nineteen years old for farm work in the state. The branch accepted responsibility for their placement in employment and after-care. Until 1930 when assisted migration ceased some 200 young men had been introduced.

In many ways, the Boy Scout Association was duplicating the work managed by the Victorian Branch of the Big Brother Movement. However, in the late 1930s the latter got into financial difficulties and in 1941 the Victorian Branch of the Big Brother Movement was dissolved and its remaining funds and assets were handed over to the scouts. In the 1950s, there was again Boy Scout Association interest in sponsoring youth migration from Britain and a small number of young people were assisted to settle in Australia.

The one or two files here reflect the brief passing interest of the Boy Scout Association in youth migration.

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Migration – Boy Scouts, 1937 [2 pages]
The file contains two newspaper cuttings: Sydney Morning Herald, 19 January 1937 and Herald (Melbourne) of the day before. In the former, the South Australian Premier announced that Sir Percy Everett, who was one of the Centenary visitors, represented the World Chief Scout and Imperial Headquarters at the Boy Scout ‘corroboree’ at Belair. The latter cutting refers to discussions regarding resuming youth migration under Scout auspices to South Australia. Imperial Headquarters had been left a legacy for the purpose. The South Australian Government was sympathetic but nothing appears to have come of the proposal at this stage.
A461, L349/1/7
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, ANNUAL SINGLE NUMBER SERIES, 1948–65D400
Recorded by:1948–66Department of Immigration, SA Branch (CA 959)
Quantity:435 metresLocation:

Adelaide

Child Migration – Victorian Boy Scout Organisation, 1954D400, SA1954/1497

Young Australia League youth migration

The Young Australia League was not concerned primarily with child or youth migration. However, during the 1920s the League sponsored 192 young British men to Western Australia on lines similar to that of the Big Brother Movement in the eastern states. The Young Australia League was established in 1905 by a dynamic and controversial businessman, J J Simons, who was born in Clare, South Australia in 1882 but moved to Fremantle in his teens. The League was intended to promote ‘education through travel’. It developed rapidly as a (mainly) middle-class youth movement – patriotic, non-sectarian, non-political. Girls were admitted, but the main focus was on young men’s activities. The League promoted interstate and overseas travel, and acted as a literary and debating society. Theatricals and other social activities were encouraged.

Simons himself had a brief and stormy political career as Labor member for East Perth in the Western Australian Legislative Assembly during the 1920s, but after his defeat turned to journalism and as part of a business syndicate acquired the Sunday Times (Perth) of which he was Managing Director. Other newspapers were purchased and Simons developed a newspaper chain in the state. Meanwhile his Young Australia League peaked with 50 000 members before World War II. Simons died in 1948.

The Young Australia League arranged many and varied activities and youth migration was important to the League only during the later 1920s. The files displayed here reflect these priorities and their main focus is on policy and financial concerns.

CORRESPONDENCE FILES, SINGLE NUMBER SERIES, 1930–32A430
Recorded by:1930–32Department of Home Affairs (CA 756)
Quantity:4.14 metresLocation:

Canberra

Visit Young Australia League, 1928–33A430, G488
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, MULTIPLE NUMBER SERIES, 1923–34A458
Recorded by:1923–34Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:49.77 metresLocation:

Canberra

Immigration Encouragement. Young Australia League – Albury Branch, 1925A458, N154/19
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, 1934–50A461
Recorded by:1934–50Prime Minister’s Department (CA 12)
Quantity:143.82 metresLocation:

Canberra

Young Australia League – After-care, 1931 [7 pages]
The Young Australia League had brought 192 migrant boys to Western Australia and been paid by the WA Government £900 per annum to assist with after-care expenses. With the onset of the Great Depression, the WA Government wanted to end the subsidy, something about which the Prime Minister’s Department was unhappy:

His Majesty’s Government fears that unless some arrangements are made to finance the YAL, the after-care arrangements made through the League will cease from 30 June 1931.

The WA Premier replied with some vigour that:

The subsidy was first granted to the YAL to form a Boy Settlers Department with the object of placing local lads leaving school in positions in the country. There was little response… the YAL then asked the Government to agree to the introduction of boys from England to be placed in the country… their interests to be watched… advise as necessary… 192 boys arrived… none in the last eighteen months and 22 lads have returned to the UK. Boys have also been introduced under the auspices of the Salvation Army and the Anglican Church Immigration Committee... the YAL has done very good work but we are in a very tight financial corner... the expense is not justified.

The material shows that a compromise was reached in which a grant of £200 was made to the Young Australia League for the next financial year after which there would be a review.

A461, E349/1/1
 
ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE FILES, ROYAL VISIT, 1927A6976
Recorded by:1926–27Federal Capital Commission (CA 226)
Quantity:1.0 metreLocation:

Canberra

Young Australia League, 1926
J J Simons, Hon. Director, Young Australia League, wrote to the Acting Prime Minister Earle Page requesting an invitation for himself and 50 YAL boys to the opening of Federal Parliament the following year. The request was not approved.
A6976, 55
  
FOLDERS OF COPIES OF CABINET PAPERS, 1976–A6006
Recorded by:1976–81Australian Archives, Central Office (CA 1720)
1981–94Australian Archives, ACT Regional Office (CA 3196)
Quantity:9.18 metresLocation:

Canberra

This series contains copies of Cabinet papers dating back to 1901.
Claim from Young Australia League for Commonwealth Financial Assistance towards the Visit of a Party of Boys to the British Empire Exhibition, 1923A6006, 1923/12/7
Young Australia League, 1929A6006, 1929/02/08
  
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, ANNUAL SINGLE NUMBER SERIES, 1903–38A1
Recorded by:1916–28Department of Home and Territories (CA 15)
1928–32Department of Home Affairs [II] (CA 24)
1932–38Department of the Interior [I] (CA 27)
Quantity:337.14 metresLocation:

Canberra

Young Australia League – West Australia, 1925–34A1, 1934/2278
 
CORRESPONDENCE FILES, WITH ‘V’ (VICTORIA) PREFIX, 1924–62B741
Recorded by:1927–46 Investigation Branch, Victoria (CA 907)
Quantity:29.88 metresLocation:

Melbourne

The Young Australia League, 1931B741/3, V8359
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF GOVERNOR-GENERAL, 1912–27CP78/22
Recorded by:1912–27Governor-General (CA 1)
Quantity:29.98 metresLocation:

Canberra

Young Australia League, 1925–26CP78/22, 1926/272